What does Item Analysis Tell Us? Factors affecting the reliability of Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs)

  • Mohamed Elhassan Abdalla Medical Education Unit Faculty of Medicine Jazan University Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Introduction: Item analysis is a very important part of the examination cycle, as it can be used to judge the difficulty and discrimination of test items as well as their reliability.


Objective: The objective of this study is to determine the relation between reliability and other components of the item analysis of Multiple Choice Question (MCQs).  


Methodology: The item analysis of 38 modules conducted at the Faculty of Medicine-Jazan University in the academic year 2010-2011 were further analyzed descriptively and correlation were made between the reliability co-efficient (KR-20) and other elements of the item analysis such as the difficulty and discrimination indices


Results: All the items have five options, the percentage of nonfunctioning options is between 27.6% and 70% across items. The facility index is < 35% is found in 18.3% of the items and facility index of > 90% is a maximum of 75%. All exams have items with a discrimination index <19% .


There is a positive correlation among the KR-20, number of items and the percentage of items with discrimination index >60% and negative correlation with percentage of the nonfunctioning options, percentage of items with facility index <35%, percentage of items with facility index >90% and percentage of items with discrimination index <19%.


Further analysis of the modules in each phase (Introductory, organ system and clinical) and qualitative analysis of the items are needed.  

References

Tavakol M, Dennick R. Post-examination analysis of objective tests. Medical Teacher 2011;33:447-58.
2.Hopkins KD. Item Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement and Evaluation: Allyn & Bacon; 1998. p. 254-72.
3.Downing S. Statistics of Testing Assessment in Health Professions Education Tylor and Francis 2009.
4.Axelson R, Clarenc K. Reliability. Assessment in Health Professions Education Tylor and Francis; 2009.
5.Rodriguez M. Three Options Are Optimal for Multiple-Choice Items: A Meta-Analysis of 80 Years of Research Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 2005. p. 4-13.
6.Woddford K, editor. Using multiple choice questions effectively in information. Beyond the Comfort zone: Proceeding of the 21st Ascilite Conference 2004.
7.Rashmi V, Supe A. Multiple Choice Question: A lierature review on optimal number of options The National Medical Journal of India 2008;21(3):130-3.
Published
2011-06-01
How to Cite
ABDALLA, Mohamed Elhassan. What does Item Analysis Tell Us? Factors affecting the reliability of Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs). Gezira Journal of Health Sciences, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 2, june 2011. ISSN 1810-5386. Available at: <http://37.60.236.48/index.php/gjhs/article/view/318>. Date accessed: 03 june 2026.
Section
Articles