Instrumental (operative) vaginal deliveries: Vacuum extraction compared with forceps delivery at Wad Medani Teaching Hospital, Sudan

  • Isam Eldien A Abdalla Faculty Of Medicine University Of Gezira, Sudan
  • Sayed Mohammed Ahmed Faculty Of Medicine University Of Gezira, Sudan
  • Elhassan Mohmed Elhassan Faculty Of Medicine University Of Gezira, Sudan
  • Omer Ahmed Mirghani Faculty Of Medicine University Of Gezira, Sudan
  • Ishag Adam New Halfa Hospital, Sudan

Abstract

   The risks to the mother and newborn associated with the use of vacuum extractor (V.E.) in comparison with those associated with the use of low delivery forceps (L.D.F.) were studied prospectively. Sixty-nine women were enrolled in to the study, all with single, full term (37 weeks or more) babies, with cephalic presentation, required assisted vaginal deliveries. They were randomized to either vacuum group (38) or forceps (31). Third degree perineal tears, vaginal and cervical lacerations, requirement of blood transfusion were observed less frequently in the group delivered by V.E., the differences were not statistically significant. One baby in the vacuum group developed cephalohaematoma. The vacuum group had a less stay in hospital (more than 48 hours) than the forceps group and the difference is statistically significant. There were no significant differences in the mean birth weight, Apgar scores and the numbers of babies admitted to the intensive care unit. One baby delivered by forceps died shortly after birth. There was no maternal death in either group.

References

1. Graves E J, Kozak L J. National hospital discharge survey: Annual summary, 1996. Vital health statistic 13 1999; 140: 1-46.
2. Bofill J A, Rust O A, Perry KG, Roberts W E, Maritin RW, Morrison J C. Operative vaginal delivery: Survey of fellow of ACOG. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996; 88: 1007-1110.
3.Yancey M K, Herpolsheimer A, Jordan G D, Benson W L, Gready K. Maternal and fetal neonatal effects of outlet forceps delivery compared with vaginal delivery in term pregnancies. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1991; 78: 646-650.
4. Combs C A, Robertson R A, Laros R K. Risk factors for third degree and four-degree perineal laceration in the forceps and vacuum deliveries. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1990; 163: 100-104.
5. Shihadeh A, Al-Najdawi W. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity. East Mediterranean Health Journal, 2001; 7: 106-114.
6. Weerasekera D S, and Premaratne S. Randomized prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2002; 22: 344-345.
7. Mesleh R A, Al-Sawadi H M, Kurdi A M. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries. Saudi Medical Journal, 2001; 23:811-813.
8.Johanson R B, and Menon B K. Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Systemic Review. 2000 CD 000224.
9. Mayer L, Mailloux J, Marcoux S, Blanchet P, Meyer F. maternal and neonatal morbidity in the instrumental deliveries with Kobayashi vacuum extractor and low forceps. Acta Obstetrica and Gynecology Scandinavians, 1987; 55-643-647
Published
2003-01-01
How to Cite
ABDALLA, Isam Eldien A et al. Instrumental (operative) vaginal deliveries: Vacuum extraction compared with forceps delivery at Wad Medani Teaching Hospital, Sudan. Gezira Journal of Health Sciences, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 1, jan. 2003. ISSN 1810-5386. Available at: <http://37.60.236.48/index.php/gjhs/article/view/146>. Date accessed: 03 june 2026.
Section
Articles