Heterosis in Intra- and Interspecific Diallel Crosses Among Some Cotton Cultivars of Sudan

  • Beatrice C. Misaka Agricultural Research Corporation, Wad Medani, Sudan
  • Abdelbagi M. Ali 1Agricultural Research Corporation, Wad Medani, Sudan
  • Abu Elhassan S. Ibrahim Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Gezira, Wad Medani, Sudan

Abstract

Estimates of mid-parent heterosis for seed cotton yield and its components were studied in six intra-hirsutum, six intra-barbadense and sixteen interspecific (Gossypium hirsutum x Gossypium barbadense) hybrids. The material was grown in 2000 and 2001 seasons at the Gezira Research Station, Wad Medani, Sudan. Highly significant variability was detected for all the measured traits. Two interspecific hybrids, Acala(93)H x B-Pima and Acala(93)H x Barakat-S, outyielded the best parent by 127.6% and 111.6%, and 116.2% and 114.4% in both seasons, respectively. The magnitude of heterotic effect was greater in the interspecific hybrids than in the intraspecific hybrids. Maximum heterosis for seed cotton yield, number of sympodia and bolls per plant and fiber quality properties was obtained in six interspecific hybrids, viz. Acala (93)H x B-Pima, Acala (93) H x Barakat-90,  Acala (93) H x Barakat- S, Shambat-B x B-Pima,  Albar(57)12 x Barakat-90 and Scala(93)H x Huda. This suggested that these hybrids can be used as commercial hybrids, hybrid performing doubled haploids and as source populations for further selection to improve cotton yield.

References

Ano, G. J. Fersing and J. L. Lacape 1983. Comparative study of the Performance of 12 F1 hybrids between Gossypium hirsutum L. and grossypium barbadense L. with their parents. Coton et Fibres Tropicales 38, fasc. 2:234-239.
Davis, D.D. 1977. Hybrid cotton: Specific problems and potentials. Advance Agronomy 30:129-157.
Davis, D.D. and A. Palomo 1980. Yield stability of interspecific hybrids NX-1. Belt. Cotton Production Research Conference. National Cotton Council of America, Memphis, USA. P.81.
Fadlalla, A.S. 1990. Prospects of hybrid cotton production in Sudan, PP 90093. In : Proceeddings of FAO-ICAR Regional Expert Consultation on Hybrid Cotton. 22-25 October 1990, CICR, Nagpur, India.
Galanopoulou-Sendouca, S.G. and D. Roupakias, 1999. Performance of cotton F1 hybrids and its relation to the mean yield of bulk generations. European Journal of Agronomy I l: 53—62.
Hussain, A., M. Rafique, T. I. Mehmood, M. A. Khan and M. Z. U, Khan 1990. Hybrid vigor in relation to development in cotton (G, hirsutum L.). Journal of Agricultural Research 28:205 — 217.
Katageri, 1. S., S. N. Kadapa, B. M. Khadi, M. R. Eshanna and R. B.
Naik. 1991. Hybrid vigor and combining ability in intra-Barbadense hybrid cotton. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science 4: 121-125,
Keerio, M.D., M.S. Kalwar, M.I. Memon and M.J. Båluch. 1996. Estimates of economic heterosis for some metrical traits of Gossypium hirsutum L. The Pakistan Cottons 40: 18-23.
Khan, M.A., H.A. Sadaqat, F.A. Khan and A. Zahoor. 1993. Predict-ing breeding potentials of some cotton strains through their per-formance in hybrid combination. The Pakistan Cottons 37:81-90.
Kowsalya, R. and J.S. Raveendran. 1997. Heterosis in intraspecific
Gossypium hybrids possessing hareknessii and hirsutum plasmons.
Plant Breeding Abstracts 67(7). Abstract 7600.

Marani, A. and E. Avieli. 1973. Heterosis during the early phases of growth in 'intraspecific and interspecific crosses of cotton. Crop Science 13: 15-18.
Meredith, Jr. W.R. 1984. Quantitative Genetics. pp. 13 -150. In R. J, Kohel and C. F. Lewis (ed.) cotton. Agron. Monogn. 24. ASA, CSSA, and SSA, Madison, WI., U. S A.
Mursal, I.E. 2003. Nour-93: Closing the quality gap. In: Cotton International. Regaining Cotton's Prosperity. Meister Publications, 37733 Euclid Avenue.
Patel. F.B., Y.M. Shinde and M. V. Thombre, 1991. Heterosis in multiple environments for yield components and its relation with genetic divergence in cotton. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 51: 118-124.
Roupakias, D.G.,E.Gouli-Vavdinoudi, M. Koutsika Sotiriou, S. Galanopou lou-Sendoucaand A. S. Mavromatis. 1998. Heterosis in cotton. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry. Bajaj, Y.P.S. (ed.), Cotton vol. 42. Springer, Berlin.
Sandhu B. S., M. S. GillandG.Singh 1993. Genetic effects of quantitatively inherited characters in cotton Gossypium arboreum L. Journal of Indian Society of Cotton Improvement 18: 33-40.
Singh, P. and S. S. Narayanan. 1993. Biometrical Techniques in Plant
Breeding. ISt edition. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, India.
Soomro, A. R. , G. H. Nachnani, A. W. Soomro and A. D. Kalhoro. 1996. Heterosis for yield in tetrapoid cotton hybrids and their reciprocals. The Pakistan Cottons 40: 18 23.
Wells, R. and Jr. W. R. Meredith 1984. Comparative growth of obsolete and modern cotton cultivars. Ill. Relationship of yield to observed growth characteristics. Crop Science 24: 868 872.
Published
2021-06-29
How to Cite
C. MISAKA, Beatrice; M. ALI, Abdelbagi; S. IBRAHIM, Abu Elhassan. Heterosis in Intra- and Interspecific Diallel Crosses Among Some Cotton Cultivars of Sudan. Gezira Journal of Agricultural Science, [S.l.], v. 2, n. 2, p. 218-232, june 2021. ISSN 1728-9556. Available at: <http://37.60.236.48/index.php/gjas/article/view/2016>. Date accessed: 03 june 2026.
Section
Articles