Gezira j. of Eng. & applied. Sci. 12-(1): 1-15(2017)
Antibacterial Activities of Garad (Acacia nilotica
L.) Plant
Thowiba Mohammed Eltayeb Mohammed1
Awad Mohamed Abdel -Rahim Mohamed2
1. Department
Of Chemistry and Biology/ Faculty of Education - University of Albutana.
2. Faculty of
Science/ University of Gezira
Abstract
Garad is
reported to has some antimicrobial activity. The aim of the present study is to
investigate the antibacterial activities of the plant. The cup plate Inhibition
zone method was used for some solvents tested. The results showed that the
Garad pods extract was more effective against E. coli and S.
paratyphi. However, the pods, bark and leaves extracts were highly
effective against Staphylococcus sp. The solvent tests showed that the
methanolic leaves extracts were effective against Staphylococcus sp. The
ethanolic bark, seeds and pods extracts of Garad were effective against E.
coli and S. paratyphi. All the petroleum ether and hexane extracts
of the plant parts were not effective against all the tested bacteria.
INTRODUCTION
A. nilotica is a plant 5 to 20 m high with a
thick spherical crown, stems and branches usually sinister to black colored,
grey-pinkish slash, fissured bark, exuding a reddish low quality gum. The plant
has straight, light, thin, grey spines in axillary pairs, usually in 3 to 12
pairs, 5 to 7.5 cm long in young trees, mature trees commonly without thorns.
The leaves are bipinnate, with 3 to 6 pairs of pinnulae and 10 to 30 pairs of
leaflets each, rachis with a gland at the bottom of the last pair of pinnulae.
Flowers in globulous heads 1.2 to 1.5 cm in diameter of a bright golden-yellow
color set up either axillary or whorly on peduncles 2 to 3 cm long located at
the end of the branches. Pods are strongly constricted, white-grey, hairy and
thick (baravker et al., 2008). A. nilotica is a pantropical and
subtropical genus with species abundant throughout Asia, Australia, Africa and
America. A. nilotica is an imperative multipurpose plant that has been
used broadly for the treatment of various diseases(Singhetal.,2009b).
Natural medicinal plants promote self healing,
good health and durability in ayurvedic medicine practices and have
acknowledged that A. nilotica can provide the nutrients and therapeutic
ingredients to prevent, mitigate or treat many diseases or conditions). It also
serves as a source of polyphenols (Singh et al., 2009a). The role of
these polyphenols to the plant itself is not well implicit, but for the human
kind they can be of prime strategies (Singh et al., 2009a). The
phytochemicals contribute chemically to a number of groups among which are
alkaloids, volatile essential oils, phenols and phenolic glycosides, resins,
oleosins, steroids, tannins and terpenes (Banso, 2009). This plant contain a
profile of a variety of bioactive components such as gallic acid, ellagic acid,
isoquercitin, leucocyanadin, kaempferol-7-diglucoside, glucopyranoside, rutin,
derivatives of (+)-catechin-5-gallate, apigenin-6,8-bis-C-glucopyranoside,
m-catechol and their derivatives (Singh et al., 2009a). It has been
reported that different parts of the plant are prosperous in tannins (ellagic
acid, gallic acid and tannic acid), stearic acid, vitamin-C (ascorbic acid),
carotene, crude protein, crude fiber, arabin, calcium, magnesium and selenium
(Meena et al., 2006). Traditionally the bark, leaves, pods and flowers
are used against cancer, cold, congestion, cough, diarrhea, dysentery, fever,
gall bladder, hemorrhoid, ophthalmia, sclerosis, tuberculosis and small pox,
leprosy, bleeding piles, leucoderma and menstrual problems. They have
spasmogenic, vasoconstrictor, anti/-hypertensive, -mutagenic, -carcinogenic,
-spasmodic, -inflammatory, -oxidant and -platelet aggregatory properties (Singh
et al., 2009b). A. nilotica has anti-plasmodial, molluscicidal,
anti-fungal, anti-microbial activity, inhibitory activity against HCV and HIV-I
(Sultana et al., 2007). The bark of the plant is used as astringent,
acrid, cooling, styptic, emollient, anthelmintic, aphrodisiac, diuretic,
expectorant, emetic and nutritive, in hemorrhage, wound ulcers, leprosy,
leucoderma, skin diseases and seminal weakness. Gum is used as astringent,
emollient, liver tonic, antipyretic and antiasthmatic (baravkar et al.,
2008). The bark is used extensively for colds, bronchitis, biliousness,
diarrhoea, dysentery, bleeding piles and leucoderma (Del, 2009). phytochemical
and pharmacological traits of this plant of high economic value.
Objectives of the study:
1.
The overall aim of this study was to find
environmentally friendly alternatives antimicrobial phytochemical compounds
from Garad plants.
2.
The extracts from the different parts of the plant
will be examined for their activities against different bacteria isolates,
using different concentrations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Source of materials
Plants
sources
Fruits (pods and seeds) of Garad were purchased
from Elhasahiesa local market. Other Garad tree parts (Leaves & bark) were
collected from nearby Garad tree-in Elhasahiesa Faculty of Education.
Microorganisms
sources
The cultures of Bacteria (Escherichia
coli, Salmonella paratyphi, and Staphylococcus sp.) were
obtained from the Food Science and Technology Laboratory, Faculty of Science
and Technology, University of Gezira.
Media used
The media used in this study were
prepared locally, using Oxoid Corporation substances. The media include the
followings:
The
Nutrient Agar Medium
This medium was used for isolation and
maintenance of bacteria, and for other experiments whenever needed. The medium
consists of the following materials: (g/L)
|
|
|
Beaf extract 1.5 |
|
Yeast extract 1.5 |
|
Na Cl 5 |
|
Agar 15 |
Preparation
of the Medium
Twenty eight grams of the prepared media
were added to 1 liter distilled water. The medium was then dispensed in 100 ml
samples in conical flasks covered with cotton plugs and aluminium foil before
being sterilized in the autoclaved at 1210 C (151/in2)
for 15 minutes.
Methods
The Inhibition Zone
Method (Cup Plate)
This method was used for measuring the inhibition zone against the
growth of the tested bacteria (E. coli, S. paratyphi, and Staphylococcus
sp.) using the Nutrient
Agar (NA) medium. In this method a
standardized cell suspensions of each bacterium were prepare and then added to
the solidified medium into sterile Petri dishes and spreaded using sterile
L-shape glass rod. Sterile Whatman glass fiber disks (No.5) were saturated with
each extract, then allowed to dry and transferred centrally on the surface of
the solidified medium in each plate. The plates were then incubated at room
temperature for 72 hours and the inhibition zones were measured as described by
Barry et al., (1970) and Cruickshank et al., (1975). The test of
the antibiotic compounds was made following the same method. Three replicates
were made for each treatment.
RESULTS
The present study
investigated the biological activity of the extracts of Garad plant parts
against three bacteria (E.coli , Staphylococcus sp. and S.
paratyphi).
The effects of the aqueous extracts of the Garad plant parts on inhibition zone of
the different three bacteria are shown in Table (1), from the data only the
pods extracts were highly effective in suppressing the inhibition zone of E.coli,
while the extracts of all other parts were less effective table (1a). Table (1b)
show the effect of Garad aqueous plant
parts extracts on inhibition zone of S. paratyphi. The extracts of pods,
seeds and the bark extracts were less effect in inhibiting growth of S.
paratyphi, although the pod extract
were more effective than the other. On contrast the leaves extract were not
effective. Table (1c) show the effect of Garad aqueous plant parts extracts on inhibition zone of Staphylococcus
sp. the results shows that, the pods, bark and leave extracts were all
highly effective in suppressing growth of Staphylococcus sp. on
the other hand, the extract of seed were less effective.
Table (2) shows the effect of the Garad
plant part methanolic extracts on the inhibition zone
of three bacteria (E. coli, S. paratyphi, and Staphylococcus sp.).
From the results it is clear that only
the leaf extracts were the highly effective against Staphylococcus sp.
Table (3) shows the effect of the Garad
plant part ethanolic extracts on the
inhibition zone of three bacteria
(E. coli, S. paratyphi, and Staphylococcus sp.). From the
results it is clear that the bark, the
seeds and the pods showed effective results
against both E.coli and S. paratyphi. However, the Staphylococcus
sp., showed some resistance to the extracts.
Table (4) show the effect of the
Garad plant part petroleum ether extracts on the inhibition
zone of the three bacteria. From
the data it is clear that all the petroleum ether extracts were not effective
against all the tested organisms.
Table (5) show the effect of the Garad
plant parts hexane extracts on the inhibition zone of the three bacteria (E. coli, S. paratyphi,
and Staphylococcus sp.). From the data it is clear that all the
hexane extracts were not effective against all the tested bacteria. Table (6)
show the effect of the anti- Gram
negative and Gram positive antibiotic (as control) against E.coli,
S. para typhi and Staphylococcus
sp. From the results it is clear that Cefotaxime, Piperacillin/
Tazobactam, Chloramphenicol and Tetracycline were effective against E.coli,
while, Ampicillin/ Sulbactam
and Ciprofloxacin, were highly effect against the same bacterium. Co-
Trimoxazole, Piperacillin/ Tazobactam, Chloramphenicol, Ciprofloxacin,
Ceftizoxime and Tetracycline, were effective, Ampicillin/ Sulbactam,
Ofloxacin, Gentamicin, Amikacin and Levofloxacin were highly effect against S. paratyphi.
Then Tetracycline, Gentamicin, Linezolid were effective against Staphylococcus
sp.
Table 1 : Effect of
Garad parts aqueous extracts on
inhibition zone (cm) of the three bacteria:
a- E.coli
|
Leaves |
Pods |
Seeds |
Bark |
Conc. (mg/ml) |
|
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0 |
|
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
25 |
|
0.6 |
1.00 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
50 |
|
0.9 |
1.8 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
75 |
|
1.6 |
2.3 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
100 |
b- Salmonella
paratyphi
|
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0 |
|
0.5 |
0.7 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
25 |
|
0.5 |
1.00 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
50 |
|
0.5 |
1.3 |
1.00 |
1.1 |
75 |
|
0.5 |
1.8 |
1.3 |
1.5 |
100 |
c- Staphylococcus
sp.
|
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0 |
|
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
25 |
|
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
50 |
|
1.4 |
1.6 |
0.9 |
1.5 |
75 |
|
1.9 |
2.00 |
1.4 |
1.9 |
100 |
Table 2: Effect of Garad parts methanolic
extracts on inhibition zone (cm) of the
three bacteria
|
Leaves |
Pods |
Seeds |
Bark |
Organisms |
|
0.5 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
1.1 |
E.coli |
|
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
Salmonella para typhi |
|
2.00 |
1.6 |
0.5 |
0.9 |
Staphylococcus sp. |
Table 3: Effect of
Garad parts ethanolic extracts on inhibition zone (cm) of the bacteria
|
Leaves |
Pods |
Seeds |
Bark |
Organisms |
|
0.5 |
1.3 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
E.coli |
|
0.5 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
Salmonella para typhi |
|
0.5 |
0.8 |
0.7 |
0.5 |
Staphylococcus sp. |
Table 4: Effect of
Garad petroleum ether extracts on inhibition zone (cm) of
the bacteria.
|
Leaves |
Pods |
Seeds |
Bark |
Organisms |
|
0.6 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.5 |
E.coli |
|
0.6 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
Salmonella para typhi |
|
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
0.5 |
Staphylococcus sp. |
Table 5: Effect of
Garad hexane extracts on inhibition zone (cm) of the tested bacteria:
|
Leaves |
Pods |
Seeds |
Bark |
Organisms |
|
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
E.coli |
|
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
Salmonella para
typhi |
|
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
Staphylococcus sp. |
Table 6 : Effect of anti- Gram negative and Gram positive
antibiotic (on inhibition zone-cm) against E.coli, S. paratyphi & Staphylococcus sp.
|
Staph. sp. |
S. paratyphi |
E.coli |
Antibiotic |
|
0.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
Ampicillin/Sulbactam
(AS) |
|
0.0 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Co- Trimoxazole
(BA) |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.6 |
Cefotaxime (CF) |
|
- |
1.7 |
1.8 |
Piperacillin/Tazobactam
(TZP) |
|
- |
1.8 |
1.5 |
Chloramphenicol
(CH) |
|
0.0 |
1.0 |
2.4 |
Ciprofloxacin (CP) |
|
- |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Ceftizoxime (CL) |
|
1.0 |
1.2 |
1.7 |
Tetracycline (TE) |
|
- |
2.5 |
0.0 |
Ofloxacin (OF) |
|
1.6 |
3.00 |
0.0 |
Gentamicin (GM) |
|
- |
2.0 |
0.0 |
Amikacin (AK)
|
|
0.0 |
2.3 |
0.0 |
Levofloxacin (LE) |
|
0.0 |
- |
- |
Co- Trimoxazole
(BA) |
|
0.0 |
- |
- |
Cepholexin (PR) |
|
1.2 |
- |
- |
Linezolid (LZ) |
|
0.0 |
- |
- |
Cloxacillin (CX) |
|
0.0 |
- |
- |
Roxithromycin (RF) |
|
0.0 |
- |
- |
Linomycin (LM) |
- Not tested
DISCUSSION
Medicinal plants represent a rich source
of antimicrobial agents (Mahesh & Satish, 2008; Adnan et al., 2010).
Many of the plant materials used in traditional medicine are readily available
in rural areas at relatively cheaper than modern medicine (Mann et al.,
2008; Gilani et al., 2010; Hussain et al., 2012).
The present study was investigated the biological activities of the
extracts of Garad plant parts against three bacteria (E. coli,
Staphylococcus sp. and S. paratyphi).
The results of the biological activities
indicated that the extracts of Garad plant parts were showing different effects
against the tested bacteria.
The effects of the
aqueous extracts of the Garad plant
parts on inhibition zone of the different three bacteria was made. From the
results: the pods extracts were highly effective in suppressing the inhibition
zone of E.coli, while the extracts of all other parts were less
effective. The extracts of pods, seeds and the bark extracts were less effect
in inhibiting growth of S. paratyphi, although the pod extract were more effective than the
other. On contrast the leaves extract were not effective. However; the pods,
bark and leave extracts were all highly effective in suppressing growth of Staphylococcus
sp. on the other hand, the extract of seed were less effective.
The study of
phytochemical properties and antibacterial activity of aqueous pods extract of A.nilotica
revealed the presence of three principal phytochemicals (tannins, saponins and
flavonoids) that have been reported to possess antibacterial activity (Giovana et
al, 2013). This could be the reason for antibacterial activity of aqueous
pods extract of A.nilotica. This study therefore reveal the potentials
of A.nilotica pod extract as antibacterial agent especially in the
management of ailments caused by organisms such as S. pyogenes, B.subtilis, C. pyogenes, K.pneumoniae and C.
albicans.
The pods of Acacia
nilotica can be used in future to develop antibiotics that can be of
benefit to humans and animals.
The aqueous extract
of A. nilotica antibacterial activity
was compared against a standard drug, tetracycline. Tetracycline showed a
better antibacterial property with highest zone of inhibition of 48 mm for S.pyogenes
at 250 mg/ml and least zone of inhibition of 16mm for S. aureus and S. typhi as compared to the highest zone
of inhibition of 25 mm at the 1000 mg/ml for B. subtilis and K. pneumonia and least zone of inhibition
of 12 mm for S. aureus and S. typhi, Respectively for A.
nilotica (Sofowora, 1993;Nwze et al., 2004)
The assays of the stem bark extracts
confirms the antimicrobial activity against Streptococcus viridans,
Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis and Shigella
sonnei using the agar diffusion method. A. nilotica could be a
potential source of antimicrobial agents (Banso, 2009).
A.nilotica demonstrates highest activity against three
bacterial (E. coli, S. aureus and Salmonella typhi) and two
fungal strain (Candida albicans and Aspergillus niger) (Kalaivani
and Methew, 2010).
The use of different solvents for
the different extracts was also made in the present study. The solvents used
include (Methanol, ethanol, petroleum ether and hexane). Only the inhibition zone method was used for this
test. From the results it was found that the Methanolic and the ethanolic extracts of Garad were more effective against the tested
organism than the other solvents ( petroleum ether and hexane). The methanolic
Garad leaves extracts were only effective against Staphylococcus sp. All
the other solvents were less effective. Methanol extracts were also reported as
the most effective by different investigators
(Abdel- Rahim et al.,2012;
Zainal et al.1988; Ahmed,
2004). Solomon and Shittu (2010) has investigated in vitro antimicrobial
activity of the crude ethanolic leaf extract of Acacia nilotica against Campylobacter coli isolated
from goats. The highest zone of inhibition in their study was observed with the
70 mg/ml concentration. Banso (2009) has studied the antimicrobial activity of
ethanolic extracts of the stem bark against Streptococcus viridans, Staphylococcus
aureus, Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis and Shigella
sonnei using the agar diffusion method and found that the minimum inhibitory concentration of
the stem bark extract ranged between 35 and 50 mg/ml while the minimum
bactericidal concentration ranged between 35 and 60 mg/ml (Banso, 2009). Khan et al (2009) has explored the
antimicrobial activities of the crude ethanolic extracts of five plants against
multidrug resistant (MDR) strains of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae
, Candida albicans and ATCC strains of Streptococcus mutans, and
different strains of microorganism. They found that Garad ( A.
nilotica) has minimum Inhibitory concentration range
9.75-313Âμg/ml (Khan, 2009). Mashram (2009) has observed the antimicrobial
activity of Acacia nilotica, against three bacteria (S. aureus, B.
subtilis and E. coli). He found that the leaf and bark extracts showed a zone
of inhibition between 7.5-16 and 8-15.5 mm, respectively and were most active
against E. coli.
Mahesh and Satish (2008) have observed the antibacterial activity study
of methanolic extracts of Acacia nilotica, and showed that the highest
antibacterial activity was against B.
subtilis. and Staphylococcus aureus with an inhibition zone of
15±0.66mm and the leaf extract showed the highest activity against Bacillus
subtilis with an inhibition zone of 20±1.20mm. Methanolic extract of the A.
nilotica is active against two animal viruses: Newcastle Disease and Fowl
pox Viruses (Mohamed et al., 2010). Saini (2008)
examined the comparative antimicrobial studies of different Acacia
species. He found that A. nilotica was exhibited the highest activity
against the three tested bacterial (Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and
Salmonella typhi). The Acacia nilotica plant extracts were also
reported by Shanab (2007) to have potent antibiotic activity against three
bacterial species (gram positive; Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus
albus, Streptococcus faecalis; a gram negative, Escherichia coli).
Methanolic extracts of the plant were found to contain keampherol which is
responsible for the antioxidant activity of the plant (Rajbir and Bikram
(2008).
Methanol extracts of Acacia nilotica pods
were found to cause a decrease in arterial blood pressure at dose (3–30 mg/kg).
It also produces an inhibitory effect on force and rate of contraction in
guinea-pig paired atria (Gilani,1999). However, Acacia species can be
regarded as promising resources for antibacterial drugs due to their highly
active nature. The antibacterial activity may be indicative of the presence of
some metabolic toxins or broad-spectrum antibiotic compounds.
Prashanth et al. (2001) and
Rajakaruna et al. (2002) reported that the bacterium Bacillus
subtilis, was more sensitive to methanol or hexane extracts of 10 plants.
On the other hand, no inhibition was observed in the Eruvinia sp. Some
organisms exhibited only slight susceptibility. E. coli was inhibited by
methanol extract of flowers of Cassia auriculata and hexane extract of Punica
granatum. Proteus vulgaris was inhibited by methanol extract of P. pterocarpum and Syzigium
lineare. Klebsiella pneumonia were inhibited by hexane extracts of Olax
scandens, methanol extracts of P. pterocarpum and Syzigium
cumini. The methanol extracts were more effective than hexane extracts.
In Sudan many studies were carried out for testing the antimicrobial
activity of some medicinal plants. Ahmed (2004) tested the extracts of 10
plants against Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria as well as Candida
albicans. He found a marked effect against the Gram positive Staph.
aureus followed by E. coli
and Candida albicans, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
Conclusions
1. The In vitro tests indicated that
there are different effects of Garad parts (bark, leaves, seeds and pods) extracts against the tested organisms.
2.
The methanolic extracts of the plant parts was the only effective among the
different solvents used.
Recommendations
1- The extracts of Garad plant can be used as
antimicrobial agent.
2- It could be suggested that Garad extracts
which traditionally used for curing many known disease would be used for
treating disease.
3-The pods of Acacia nilotica can be
used in future to develop antibiotics that can be of benefit to humans and
animals.
Abdel-Rahim, A.M.; Yousif, W.A. and Idris, F.A (2012). Antifungal
activity f the extracts of Garad (Acacia nilotica).Gezira Jornal Of Engineering & Applied Sciences 7 (2)
1-18.
Adnan, M., J. Hussain, M.T. Shah, F. Ullah, Z.K. Shinwari, A. Bahadar,
and A.L. Khan (2010). Proximate and
nutrient Composition of Medicinal Plants of Humid and Subhumid regions in Northwest Pakistan. J. Med. Pl.
Res., 4(4):
339-345.
Ahmed,M.M. (2004). Phytochemical. Antimalarial, Molluscicigdal and
Antimicrobial Activity of Selected Sudanese Medicinal Plants with Emphasis on Nigella
sativa L.seeds.Ph.D. Thesis, University of Gezira. Pp.75-78.
Banso, A. (2009). Phytochemical and
antibacterial investigation of bark extracts of Acacia nilotica. J.
Med. Plants Res., 3(2): 082-085.
Baravkar,
A.A, Kale R.N, Patil R.N, Sawant S.D (2008). Pharmaceutical and biological
evaluation of formulated cream of methanolic extract of Acacia nilotica leaves. Res. J. Pharm. Technol.,
1(4): 481-483.
Barry, A. L.; Garacia,F.; and
Trupp, I.D. (1970). Interpretation of sensitivity Test result. Am. J. Clin.
Path,; 53:149-155.
Cruickshank, R.J.; Dugide, J.P. and Swanin, R.H.(1975). Medicinal Microbiology: II Edinburgh, 12-Ehank-d.
Del, W.E. (2009). In vitro evaluation of
peroxyl radical scavenging capacity
of water extract / fractions of Acacia nilotica (L.). Afr. J. Biotechnol., 8(7): 1270-1272.
Gilani, A.H. (1999) Studies on
Antihypertensive and Antispasmodic Activities of Methanol Extract of Acacia
nilotica Pods. Phytother. Res.,13: 665–669.
Gilani, S.A., Y. Fujii, Z.K. Shinwari, M. Adnan, A.
Kikuchi and K.N.
Watanabe. (2010). Phytotoxic studies of medicinal plant species of Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot., 42(2): 987-996.
Giovana,
M.L.F., Ana L., Valéria, S.C.C., Bianca, W.B., Silvana, G.,Saulo, F.A., Suzelei de Castro,
F.1 and Ana, M.S.P. (2013). Antimicrobial activity
and rates of tannins in Stryphnodendrona dstringens Mart. accessions
collected in the Brazilian Cerrado. American J.Plant Sci.4: 2193-2198.
Hussain, F., S.S. Shaukat, M. Abid and F. Usman.
(2012). Somebimportant
medicinal
plants associated with the vegetation in District Mirpurkhas,
Sindh.
Int. J. Biol. Biotech., 9(4): 405-420.
Kalaivani T, Mathew L (2010). Free
radical scavenging activity from leaves
of Acacia nilotica (L.) Wil . ex Delile, an Indian medicinal tree. Food
Chem. Toxicol., 48: 298-305.
Khan, R. (2009). Antimicrobial
activity of five herbal extracts against multi drug resistant (MDR) strains of
bacteria and fungus of clinical origin. Molecules., 14(2): 586-597.
Khan, R.; Barira, I.; Mohd, A.; and Shazi, S. (2009).
Antimicrobial activity of five herbal extracts against multi drug resistant
(MDR) strains of bacteria and fungus of clinical origin. Molecules.,
14(2): 586-597.
Mahesh, B. and Satish, S. (2008).
Antimicrobial Activity of Some Important Medicinal Plant against Plant and
Human Pathogens. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences., 4 (s):
839-843.
Mann, A., A. Banso and L.C. Clifford. (2008).
An antifungal property of crude
plant extracts from Anogeissus leiocarpus and Terminalia avicennioides.Tanzania
J.Health Res., 10: 34-38.
Mashram, N. (2009). Antimicrobial
activity of methanol extracts of medicinal plants against bacterial species. Int.
Res. J., I (3 and 4): 147-150.
Meena PD, Kaushik P, Shukla S, Soni AK, Kumar M,
Kumar A2006).
Anticance and antimutagenic properties of
Acacia nilotica (Linn.) on 7,
12- dimethylbenz(a) anthracene-induced skin papillomagenesis in Swiss albino
mice. Asian Pac. J. Can. Prev., 7: 627-632.
Mohamed, L.T.; Bushra, E.I.S. and Abdelrahman, M.N. (2010).
The antibacterial, antiviral activities and phytochemical screening of some
Sudanese medicinal plants. Eur. Asian. J. BioSciences., 4: 8-16.
Nwze, E.I., Okafor, J.I. and Njoku, O.
(2004).Antimicrobial activities of methanolic
extracts of Tremaguniensis (Schum and Thom) and Morinda lucida Benth used in Nigerian herbal medical practices. J.
Biol. Res. Biotechnol. 2: 39-46.
Prashanth, D.; Asha, M.K.;
Amit, A. (2001). Antibacterial activity of Punica granatum.
Fitoterapia 72:171-173.
Rajakaruna, N.;
Harris, C.S. Towers, G.H.N. (2002). Antimicrobial activity of plants from
Serpentine outcrops in Sri Lanka.Pharmaceutical Biology, 40:235-244.
Rajbir, S. and Bikram, S. (2008) Anti-free radical activities
of kaempferol isolated from Acacia nilotica (L.) Willd. Ex. Del. Toxicology
in Vitro., 22(8): 1965–1970.
Saini, M.L. (2008)
Comparative Pharmacognostical and antimicrobial studies of Acacia species
(Mimosaceae). Journal of Medicinal Plants Research., 2(12):378-386.
Shanab, S.M.M (2007). Antioxidant and antibiotic activities
of some seaweeds (Egyptian Isolates). Int. J. Agri. Biol., 9(2):
220-225.
Singh BN, Singh BR, Singh, RL,
Prakash D, Sarma BK, Singh HB (2009a).
Antioxidant and anti-quorum sensing activities of green pod of Acacia nilotica L. Food Chem. Toxicol., 47:
778-786.
Singh BN, Singh BR, Sarma BK,
Singh HB (2009b). Potential chemoprevention
of N-nitrosodiethylamine-induced hepatocarcinogenesis
by polyphenolics from Acacia nilotica bark. Chem-Biol. Interact., 181: 20-28.
Sofowora, A. (1993). Screening Plants for Bioactive
Agents. In: Medicinal Plants
and Traditional Medicine in Africa. (2nd edn.), Spectrum Books Ltd. Sunshine House, Ibadan.
Solomon, G.O. and Shittu, G.A. (2010). In vitro antimicrobial
and phytochemical activities of Acacia nilotica leaf extract. J. Med.
Plant Res., 4(12):1232-1234.
Sultana B, Anwar F,
Przybylski R (2007). Antioxidant activity of phenolic components
present in barks of Azadirachta indica, Terminalia arjuna, Acacia nilotica, and Eugenia jambolana Lam. trees. Food Chem., 104: 1106-1114.
Zinal. A. S., Abdel-Rahim, A. M.; Abu-Ali, R. M. and
Radwan, S.S. (1988). Antimicrobial substances in the leaf litter of
the Xerophyte prospis Juliflora. Zentralbl Mikrobial., 143: 375-381.